| Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP: "NPC bounties inject too much ISK into the economy, so let's leave bounties alone and nerf carriers and supers into oblivion." Seriously, you're generating memes here, CCP, for smart thinking.
- by Memphis Baas - at 2017.06.09 17:21:32
|
2. Sticky:[118.6] Recurring Opportunity removal - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Seems like a pointless experiment. You have enough market data to assess the "value" we place on skillpoints vs. ISK or other rewards. If you were beta-testing the process of rewarding skillpoints through the opportunities system, it seems to hav...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.06.28 15:19:46
|
3. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Shallanna Yassavi wrote: Discovery isn't a game, though. We're actually telling researchers what their microscope looked at in the lab, and they're probably going to use those results develop medicines and diagnose tricky diseases based on the ...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.04.25 22:20:22
|
4. Sticky:Daily Opportunities coming soon - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
If you reward skillpoints for the first NPC kill (and in the future for the first asteroid mined, first production job, first exploration site probed, whatever), people will just feel pressured to log in daily for all of 10 minutes to get their fi...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.04.15 01:12:51
|
5. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
I agree in principle with that, but they have to make sure that the example slides contain only the single cell feature that they're exemplifying. Blur and distort all you want, but if the example for plasma membrane shows a cell with plasma membr...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.31 22:31:02
|
6. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
SurrenderMonkey wrote: This is a good change, however, I feel like the training samples need to be harder. A lot harder. I can actually predict, with pretty close to perfect accuracy (exceptions are, e.g., microtubules, where the unknown sampl...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.31 00:22:17
|
7. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The submission history is empty for everyone; they removed that functionality. We used to get rated by the Project Discovery people and that's how our accuracy increased; now the system automatically rates your accuracy by giving you the tutorial ...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.29 18:17:04
|
8. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Give them a couple weeks and then switch to "no more Project Discovery until they fix it" mode. Nothing more damaging than a rewards system that's unfair or that rewards wrong choices.
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.27 13:45:07
|
9. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Ideas: 1. We can write notes on other pilots' Show Info pages, to keep track of behavior. If you're not doing so already, CCP, start keeping track of the choices each character makes for Project Discovery, so you can easily differentiate between ...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.26 13:16:52
|
10. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Accuracy now seems to be similar to gaining standings, what you get depends on how close to 100 you are (with diminishing returns). Which is ok. We're still doing this , though, which I found hilarious.
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.26 01:37:20
|
11. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
You guys do remember that game players aren't looking for interesting or challenging, right? Cause if it were so, the NPCs would whoop our asses, and the PVP'ers would fight each other rather than trying to kill industrials and freighters. Playe...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.23 21:35:52
|
12. Project Discovery - Changes to the scoring system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
That 77% cytoplasm choice seems to reflect how badly we're metagaming the system, despite all the praise that we're doing a good job. Clearly one way for people to achieve 99% accuracy is to go through the samples as fast as possible and record th...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.23 19:58:43
|
13. Sticky:[Citadels] Changing NPC taxes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: If people ignore citadels markets then that will be evidence that the npc trading taxes have been set too low... In theory, yes. In practice, adversity to risk is the same as people refusing to move to player corps (because o...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.03 17:03:26
|
14. Sticky:[Citadels] Changing NPC taxes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
rsantos wrote: Limited office space will bring more income to citadel owners. That's only true if they keep the current mechanic where rent prices increase based on how full the station is. But they're not keeping that mechanic. Rent price...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.03 16:51:27
|
15. Sticky:[Citadels] Changing NPC taxes - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
For everyone complaining of higher NPC taxes (here and in the reddit thread): CCP needs to have more ISK sinks, which they are achieving through the higher taxes and through the ISK loss rather than mineral loss for refining. For CCP: if you real...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.03.03 16:35:44
|
16. Sticky:[February] Force Auxiliary Skills - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
You're also ignoring the specifics of the carrier changes, where you won't be able to be a "perfect DPS carrier pilot" because they're adding player skill into the equation: how good you are at managing your launches, returns, and refittings. Th...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.02.10 16:11:06
|
17. Sticky:[February] Force Auxiliary Skills - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Maybe we're thinking about this the wrong way: Technically, the Force Auxiliary ships are NOT carriers; they don't have fighters (the drones they have are for defense). It may be less expensive (skillpoint wise) to transform dreadnoughts to forc...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.02.10 14:43:47
|
18. Sticky:[February] Force Auxiliary Skills - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cara Forelli wrote: Looks at wallet Welp...which FAX do I want to pay for....again? Oh wait, I don't know because I don't have any details. I think they only released this thread because Kahn Liam was having a panic attack in the other ...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.02.09 00:21:04
|
19. Sticky:[February] Force Auxiliary Skills - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: Any character with Tactical Logistics Reconfiguration, a Carrier and Force Auxiliary skill (of the same race) injected when the citadels expansion launches, will have the racial carrier skillpoints refunded as unallocated sk...
- by Memphis Baas - at 2016.02.08 20:14:35
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |